Definition: Which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Amos, which was [the son] of Naum, which was [the son] of Esli, which was [the son] of Nagge,

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Luke 3:25. It’s a really interesting and somewhat unusual passage! Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, this verse tells us about a baby named Jesus. Let’s unpack each part: “Which was…” : This phrase is a way of introducing a list or succession. “the son” : This refers to the first child in a line that includes several important figures. “…of Mattathias, which was…” : Mattathias was a tough and rebellious man in ancient Israel. He was known for his strict laws and punishment. “…son” : This means this baby is the son of Mattathias. “…of Amos, which was…” : Amos was another man who was known for his strong convictions and rebellion. “…son” : This is the second child in that line. “…of Naum, which was…” : Naum was a man who experienced hardship and exile. He was a survivor of a terrible event. “…son” : This is the third child in that line. “…of Esli, which was…” : Esli was a man who also lived under difficult circumstances. “…son” : This is the fourth child in that line. “…of Nagge, which was…” : Nagge was a woman with a powerful and unwavering spirit. So, Luke 3:25 says: “This baby is the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Naum, the son of Esli, and the son of Nagge.” Why is this important? This genealogy (the line of ancestors) is significant because it’s the very foundation of Jesus' lineage. It connects him directly to the righteous people of Israel who were known for their faith and dedication to God. In a nutshell, it’s the story of how Jesus was born into a family with a strong tradition of following God’s laws. --- Do you have any specific questions about this verse that you'd like me to answer? For example, would you like me to: Explain the historical context of this passage? Discuss what it might symbolize?